This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of utilise.

RX560-Image

When AMD launched the RX 560 GPU, as an upgrade to the older RX 460, it upgraded the specs of the card slightly. Different the RX 580 and RX 570, which retained their GPU cores, texture units, and ROP configurations and just targeted significantly higher clock speeds, the RX 560 actually inverse the cadre configuration from 896:56:16 (RX 460) to 1024:64:sixteen. Now, AMD has obviously changed its RX 560 configuration without giving whatsoever sign they actually did so. The RX 560 is at present selling in an 896-cadre configuration; we're bold it's the same 896:56:16 configuration as the RX 460.

To be perfectly articulate: We don't corroborate of or disregard this practice. It'south not unusual for GPUs to exist sold in different retention configurations, but some companies, like VisionTek, don't even list the core count on their RX 560s on their own product pages. A sufficiently high base clock and turbo heave could recoup for the loss of the texture mapping units and GPU cores, but that doesn't seem to exist what'south happened here.

It would exist one affair if these GPUs were confined to the bottom of the market, or restricted to 2GB configurations, only they aren't. Browsing Newegg shows enough of Radeon RX 560s for auction in both 896 and 1,024-core configurations, including an Asus RX 560 with 896 cores for a whopping $140. (In that location's an Asus RX 560 that shows on Newegg's product page as costing $166, but when you click through information technology'due south priced at $129).

With the higher up in mind, we also have to acknowledge this is far from the first time that AMD or Nvidia have sold multiple GPUs nether a unmarried SKU, with i part existence much faster than the other. Several years ago, it was common to meet low-terminate GPUs equipped with a GDDR5 and a DDR3 choice, with the GDDR5 card almost invariably performing better. Nvidia's GT 630 came in a 96:sixteen:4 configuration and a 384:16:eight configuration. Both companies have, at various times, launched OEM or even standard editions of GPUs with varying core counts. And that'south non even considering that in some cases, the relative divergence between ii GPUs with a like model number is vastly dissimilar. The Radeon HD 7790 was far, far faster than the Radeon 7770 than a elementary twenty-point difference in their model numbers would account for. Data beneath courtesy of Anandtech's Demote comparison tool, there are boosted results at this link that aren't shown in the graph below. The 7770 is in bluish, the 7790 is in red.

7770-vs-7790

The moral of the story here is both AMD and Nvidia have played this kind of bill of fare before. It'southward not clear why AMD did then; the RX 560 has been in-market place for months, information technology's widely bachelor in both configurations, and the yields AMD gets on the carte du jour should be mature, since information technology's based on the RX 460 and didn't pick up enough clock speed to require a serious binning deviation.

The situation in this example is too worse because the GTX 1050 and the RX 560 are neck and cervix with each other over an unabridged suite of games. TechSpot did a 30-game roundup and found the GTX 1050 had just a 1fps reward over the 1024-core version of AMD'southward scrap — but check out the spread between them depending on the title.

30game

If you pull 128 cores off the RX 560, chances are that tilts things a chip more towards the GTX 1050, and some of the RX 560s are priced so high, they're competing against the 1050 Ti (which wins that comparison decisively). Given these circumstances, nosotros really can't recommend anyone purchase the neutered version of the RX 560. Nvidia competes effectively in this price bracket.

And while we're certain no ane's going to listen, it's high fourth dimension GPU manufacturers stopped pulling this crap. Call it the RX 558 if you have to. Call information technology the RX 560 896-Core Edition. Call it the RX 560 14CU. But while the functioning gap between the 896 and 1,024 core-versions isn't huge, all the initial results on Google were done with the i,024-cadre variant. Silently adding a second option might be pretty common in the m scheme of things, simply it'due south non consumer-friendly.